For compliance & legal teams
A clause is only as strong as the evidence behind it.
A placement clause that no one is systematically checking isn't really a contractual protection — it's an assumption of good faith, backed by whatever an account manager happened to notice. Pecker replaces the assumption with a record.
Records that aren't edited after the fact
Every probe writes once, at scan time. A position history is a sequence of individually timestamped checks, not a summary someone compiled after the question was raised.
A screenshot, not a claim
Every check carries a picture of the page as it looked at that moment - see evidence & reporting.
A defensible check cadence
Configurable per operator and per game, and consistent - the same standard applied everywhere, which matters if a dispute ever asks why one operator was checked more closely than another.
Data that stays under your control
Self-hosted or managed on infrastructure dedicated to your account - never a shared multi-tenant database. Details on security & data handling.
None of this is about catching every operator out. Most placement relationships are honoured most of the time. What a systematic record does is remove the doubt in the minority of cases where it wasn't — so the conversation that follows is short, specific, and hard to argue with.
The terms that show up in placement contracts, defined plainly.
Read more →Catching a slide before it becomes a pattern worth escalating.
Read more →What counts as good evidence in a placement dispute.
Read more →